According to the Economic Reference, the jewelry brand replica cartier watches was spot-checked by the Zhejiang Provincial Administration for Industry and Commerce. The results released in June showed that five batches of jewelry marked with the “fake cartier” brand sampled, and five failed batches…

The report lists six complaints in China in recent years, covering replica cartier men’s and women’s watches, handbags, belts, and other products, saying that replica cartiers’s quality and after-sales are worrying.

Some examples of Chinese consumers complaining about fake cartier watch premium watches listed in the Economic Reference:

IN MAY 2014, MS. LIU

A consumer in Shenyang, spent 52,000 yuan on buying an cartier replica watches female watch. After using it for three years, the needle stopped working five times. cartier watches replica denied that the clock had a quality problem.

IN MARCH 2014, MR. LEI

A consumer in Nanchang, spent more than 180,000 yuan on buying an cartier fakes men’s watch, which worn for less than two months, and the clock fell off his head. To this end, Mr. Lei found a counter for fake cartier watches watches and requested a return. After negotiation, the other party refused to return the goods and only agreed to pay for repairs.

IN MARCH 2014,MR. ZHENG

A consumer in Changchun, bought an fake cartier watches watch worth 300,000 yuan from South Korea. The watch mirror had not artificially dropped within two years. The merchant refused the global warranty because the clock had expired, and Mr. Zheng was responsible for the repair costs. Mr. Zheng believes that from the date of delivery, the comprehensive warranty period of 2 years has not exceeded.

IN JANUARY 2013, THE CONSUMER, MR. YANG

Purchased a Cartier Blue balloon ladies’ watch from The Shilla Duty-Free in Seoul. After returning to China, Mr. Yang came across the light and found that the dial of the Cartier Blue balloon watch was at nine o’clock, and the black time scale was on the foreign matter. After testing, Cartier needs to open the case to clean the dial. Since then, Mr. Yang has found Cartier China Aftermarket and Korea Silla Duty-Free. Cartier China’s after-sales attitude is callous. It insists that Mr. Yang maintains the watch and cannot take any returns and compensations in China. The Silla Duty-Free Korea responded and asked Mr. Yang to go to South Korea for return procedures shortly, but the ticket and all expenses It is up to Mr. Yang to take care of himself.

Other Cartier products have been exposed to quality problems from time to time in recent years:

IN JUNE 2012, MS. MIAO

A Harbin consumer, spent 11,350 yuan on buying a Cartier red boutique leather bag. Just after unpacking, it found that the leather at the edges of the container was broken, exposing a white lining. The seller stated that the goods could be exchanged, but refused to return the goods, insisting that the quality of the product was no problem. Ms. Miao rejected when she asked the store staff to check the product quality inspection certificate of the bag.

IN JULY 2011, MR. SUN, A CONSUMER

Purchased a Cartier belt worth 5,000 yuan. One month after the purchase, the leather buckle had problems. After spending 2,000 yuan for maintenance, I found that there was an extra sweat stain on the belt when I picked up the goods. After coordination, Cartier believes that there is no problem with belt quality and after-sales maintenance.

THE RICHEMONT SA

Cartier belongs to the world’s second-largest luxury goods group-Switzerland “Cie. Financière Richemont SA (CFR.VX) Richemont Group”, the group’s brands include Vacheron Constantin, Jaeger-LeCoultre, Lang Prestigious watch brands such as Lange & S?hne, Officine Panerai, IWC, Piaget, and two major jewelry brands, Cartier and Van Cleef & Arpels.

VAN CLEEF & ARPELS ENCOUNTERS CONSUMER COMPLAINTS

Van Cleef & Arpels also previously encountered consumer complaints, and some consumers even carried multiple banners to Van Cleef & Arpels to protest. The protest consumer sent pictures of the protest scene to the Internet but subsequently deleted almost all, and it is not clear whether it is due to Richemont SA’s money public relations.